Research Paper

Split Viewer

Econ. Environ. Geol. 2023; 56(2): 201-215

Published online April 30, 2023

https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

© THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY

Investigation of Source Area and Material Characteristics of the Stone Properties from Stone-lined Tombs in Cheongyang Rokpyeong-ri Site, Korea

Il Kyu Choi1, Jun Ho Song1, Bo Seon Lee2, Chan Hee Lee1,*

1Department of Cultural Heritage Conservation Sciences, Kongju National University, Gongju 32588, Korea
2Baekje Research Institute for Cultural Heritage, Buyeo 33128, Korea

Correspondence to : *chanlee@kongju.ac.kr

Received: March 8, 2023; Revised: March 31, 2023; Accepted: April 3, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In the stone-lined tombs from Cheongyang Rokpyeong-ri site, several stone-lined tombs corresponding to the Three Kingdoms Period, Unified Silla Period and Goryeo Dynasty were excavated. In this study, the stone properties of petrological, mineralogical and geochemical characteristics from 15 stone-lined tombs were analyzed, the rock species and occupation rate were reviewed, also the provenance area was interpreted. There are five types of rocks used as members of the tombs, including black sandstone, greywacke, slate, conglomerate and gneiss. As a result of magnetic susceptibilities, the rocks of the tombs and presumed provenance are all shown in the same range, and the similarity between the tombs and the source area is high in geochemical behavior characteristics. The stone properties of the tombs are the same as the presumed provenance rocks and is distributed within a 500m around the bedrock of the tombs in the excavation site, so it seems that self-sufficiency was possible on the site without a special procurement system. These stones are interpreted to have been constructed through some trimming without any special technique, but some stone tombs have been confirmed to used homogeneous black sandstone at the bottom of the tombs, so it is believed that there were artificial selection of stones.

Keywords Rokpyeong-ri site, stone-lined tombs, rock properties, provenance area, procurement system

청양 록평리 유적 석곽묘 석재의 재질특성 및 산지탐색

최일규1 · 송준호1 · 이보선2 · 이찬희1,*

1국립공주대학교 문화재보존과학과
2백제문화재연구원

요 약

청양 록평리 유적에서는 삼국시대와 통일신라 및 고려시대에 해당하는 여러 기의 석곽묘가 발굴되었다. 이 연구에서는 15기의 석곽묘를 대상으로 암석광물학적 및 지구화학적 특성을 분석하여 암종과 점유율을 검토하고 석재의 산지를 해석하였다. 석곽묘 부재로 사용한 암석은 흑색 사암, 잡사암, 점판암, 역암 및 편마암 등 5종이다. 전암대자율 측정 결과, 석곽묘와 추정산지의 동종 암석은 모두 같은 범위에 도시되며, 지구화학적 거동특성도 연구대상과 추정산지 석재의 유사성이 높게 나타난다. 석곽묘의 석재는 추정산지 암석과 성인적으로 동일하며, 유적의 기반암과 500m 이내에 분포하고 있어 특별한 조달체계 없이 현장에서 자급자족이 가능했을 것으로 보인다. 이 석재들은 특별한 치석 없이 약간의 할석을 통해 축조한 것으로 판단되나, 일부 석곽묘의 부석시설로는 균질한 흑색 사암을 사용한 것으로 보아 석재의 인위적인 선별이 있었던 것으로 해석된다.

주요어 록평리 유적, 석곽묘, 석재, 공급지, 조달체계

Article

Research Paper

Econ. Environ. Geol. 2023; 56(2): 201-215

Published online April 30, 2023 https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

Copyright © THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY.

Investigation of Source Area and Material Characteristics of the Stone Properties from Stone-lined Tombs in Cheongyang Rokpyeong-ri Site, Korea

Il Kyu Choi1, Jun Ho Song1, Bo Seon Lee2, Chan Hee Lee1,*

1Department of Cultural Heritage Conservation Sciences, Kongju National University, Gongju 32588, Korea
2Baekje Research Institute for Cultural Heritage, Buyeo 33128, Korea

Correspondence to:*chanlee@kongju.ac.kr

Received: March 8, 2023; Revised: March 31, 2023; Accepted: April 3, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In the stone-lined tombs from Cheongyang Rokpyeong-ri site, several stone-lined tombs corresponding to the Three Kingdoms Period, Unified Silla Period and Goryeo Dynasty were excavated. In this study, the stone properties of petrological, mineralogical and geochemical characteristics from 15 stone-lined tombs were analyzed, the rock species and occupation rate were reviewed, also the provenance area was interpreted. There are five types of rocks used as members of the tombs, including black sandstone, greywacke, slate, conglomerate and gneiss. As a result of magnetic susceptibilities, the rocks of the tombs and presumed provenance are all shown in the same range, and the similarity between the tombs and the source area is high in geochemical behavior characteristics. The stone properties of the tombs are the same as the presumed provenance rocks and is distributed within a 500m around the bedrock of the tombs in the excavation site, so it seems that self-sufficiency was possible on the site without a special procurement system. These stones are interpreted to have been constructed through some trimming without any special technique, but some stone tombs have been confirmed to used homogeneous black sandstone at the bottom of the tombs, so it is believed that there were artificial selection of stones.

Keywords Rokpyeong-ri site, stone-lined tombs, rock properties, provenance area, procurement system

청양 록평리 유적 석곽묘 석재의 재질특성 및 산지탐색

최일규1 · 송준호1 · 이보선2 · 이찬희1,*

1국립공주대학교 문화재보존과학과
2백제문화재연구원

Received: March 8, 2023; Revised: March 31, 2023; Accepted: April 3, 2023

요 약

청양 록평리 유적에서는 삼국시대와 통일신라 및 고려시대에 해당하는 여러 기의 석곽묘가 발굴되었다. 이 연구에서는 15기의 석곽묘를 대상으로 암석광물학적 및 지구화학적 특성을 분석하여 암종과 점유율을 검토하고 석재의 산지를 해석하였다. 석곽묘 부재로 사용한 암석은 흑색 사암, 잡사암, 점판암, 역암 및 편마암 등 5종이다. 전암대자율 측정 결과, 석곽묘와 추정산지의 동종 암석은 모두 같은 범위에 도시되며, 지구화학적 거동특성도 연구대상과 추정산지 석재의 유사성이 높게 나타난다. 석곽묘의 석재는 추정산지 암석과 성인적으로 동일하며, 유적의 기반암과 500m 이내에 분포하고 있어 특별한 조달체계 없이 현장에서 자급자족이 가능했을 것으로 보인다. 이 석재들은 특별한 치석 없이 약간의 할석을 통해 축조한 것으로 판단되나, 일부 석곽묘의 부석시설로는 균질한 흑색 사암을 사용한 것으로 보아 석재의 인위적인 선별이 있었던 것으로 해석된다.

주요어 록평리 유적, 석곽묘, 석재, 공급지, 조달체계

    Fig 1.

    Figure 1.Photographs showing the stone-lined tombs in the Rokpyeong-ri site. (A) Excavation sites of the location around the survey areas. (B) Field distributions of the sites in the survey area 1.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 2.

    Figure 2.Representative occurrences of the stone-lined tombs in the study area. (A to E) The stone-lined tombs in area 1. (F to H) The stone-lined tombs in area 5.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 3.

    Figure 3.Representative stone properties of the stone-lined tombs in the study area. (A) C-BS, (B) C-GW, (C) C-SL, (D) C-CG, (E) C-GN. Sample numbers are the same as those of Table 1.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 4.

    Figure 4.Lithological maps showing the stone-lined tombs in the study area. Site numbers are the same as those of Table 2.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 5.

    Figure 5.Representative stereoscopic and polarizing microphotographs showing the stone properties of the stone-lined tombs in the study area. PPL; under the plane polarized light, XPL; under the cross polarized light.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 6.

    Figure 6.X-ray powder diffraction patterns showing the stone properties of the stone-lined tombs in the study area. Q; quartz, Ch; chlorite, M; mica, Pl; plagioclase, Af; alkali feldspar.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 7.

    Figure 7.Magnetic susceptibilities showing the stone properties of the stone-lined tombs in the study area.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 8.

    Figure 8.Simplified geological map around the study area.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 9.

    Figure 9.Representative rocks showing the presumed provenances for the stone-lined tombs in the study area. (A) CS-BS, (B) CS-GW, (C) CS-SL, (D) CS-CG, (E) CS-GN. Sample numbers are the same as those of Table 3.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 10.

    Figure 10.Representative stereoscopic and polarizing microphotographs showing the rocks from the presumed provenance for the stonelined tombs in the study area. PPL; under the plane polarized light, XPL; under the cross polarized light.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 11.

    Figure 11.X-ray powder diffraction patterns showing the rocks from the presumed provenance for the stone-lined tombs in the study area. Q; quartz, Ch; chlorite, M; mica, Pl; plagioclase, Af; alkali feldspar.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 12.

    Figure 12.Magnetic susceptibilities showing the rocks from the presumed provenances and the stone-lined tombs in the study area.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 13.

    Figure 13.Diagrams showing the normalized major elements (A), rare earth elements (B), compatible and incompatible elements (C) patterns of the rocks from the presumed provenances and the stone-lined tombs in the study area.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Fig 14.

    Figure 14.Possible provenance interpretation showing the stone properties of the stone-lined tombs around the study area. (A, B) Detailed topographic distributions around the study area.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2023; 56: 201-215https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2023.56.2.201

    Table 1 . Representative stone properties of the stone-lined tombs in the Rokpyeong-ri site.

    Rock typeNo.LocationPeriod
    Black SandstoneC-BSArea 1, Tomb No. 15Three Kingdoms
    GreywackeC-GWArea 1, Tomb No. 22Three Kingdoms
    SlateC-SLArea 5, Tomb No. 4Unified Silla
    ConglomerateC-CGArea 1, Tomb No. 2Goryeo
    GneissC-GNArea 5, Tomb No. 1Unified Silla

    Table 2 . Description for stone properties of the stone-lined tombs in the study area.

    No.LocationPeriodNo.LocationPeriod
    AArea 1, Tomb No. 01Three KingdomsIArea 1, Tomb No. 05Unified Silla
    BArea 1, Tomb No. 08Three KingdomsJArea 1, Tomb No. 02Goryeo
    CArea 1, Tomb No. 11Three KingdomsKArea 5, Tomb No. 01Unified Silla
    DArea 1, Tomb No. 15Three KingdomsLArea 5, Tomb No. 02Unified Silla
    EArea 1, Tomb No. 22Three KingdomsMArea 5, Tomb No. 03Unified Silla
    FArea 1, Tomb No. 24Three KingdomsNArea 5, Tomb No. 04Unified Silla
    GArea 1, Tomb No. 31Three KingdomsOArea 5, Tomb No. 05Unified Silla
    HArea 1, Tomb No. 01Unified Silla---

    Table 3 . Rock samples of presumed provenances for stone properties from the stone-lined tombs in the study area.

    Rock typeNo.Location
    Black SandstoneCS-BSNorthwest slope of Mt. Bibongsan
    GreywackeCS-GW
    SlateCS-SL
    ConglomerateCS-CG
    GneissCS-GN

    Table 4 . Compositions of major (wt.%), some minor and rare earth (ppm) elements for stone properties from the stone-lined tombs and presumed provenance rocks around the study area. Sample numbers are the same as those of Table 1 and 3.

    No.Stones of stone-lined tombsRocks of presumed provenance
    C-BSC-GWC-SLC-CGC-GNCS-BSCS-GWCS-SLCS-CGCS-GN
    SiO293.7565.8471.9962.5669.1879.9566.9960.5663.4768.21
    Al2O34.0118.6916.3117.6118.5911.4418.2821.1717.9116.88
    Fe2O30.725.721.269.493.432.644.956.378.906.31
    MnO0.010.040.040.050.020.010.040.040.050.04
    MgO0.140.580.120.940.260.310.571.140.830.68
    CaO0.030.040.260.020.020.030.020.020.030.02
    Na2O0.080.390.870.250.220.140.170.350.170.23
    K2O0.963.973.463.54.812.794.534.644.013.75
    TiO20.051.360.581.250.330.301.041.041.201.03
    P2O50.040.130.220.050.040.070.100.080.070.06
    LOI0.913.673.483.633.362.273.814.183.873.14
    Total99.7996.7695.1195.7296.9097.6896.6995.4196.6497.21
    Ba2069835408171,3303611,020912999914
    Be1625525445
    Cd<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5
    Co151124345107
    Cr1347443312636645138
    Cu4132931976206
    Hf1.515.16.316.24.612.912.18.416.612.6
    Ni1029926152420312522
    Pb16442626251555162848
    Rb60210110140220160220230170140
    Sc0.98.69.310.85.84.97.712.615.412.4
    Sr23159113504766771065551
    V8447242171931515039
    Zn11852715145721018412384
    Zr51670230638187463534319658529
    La10.3244.033.975.935.883.3116.0180.090.9109.0
    Ce192957716358113171353216215
    Nd512629632381571548182
    Sm1.514.86.111.14.913.56.425.113.915.4
    Eu0.31.91.31.50.71.60.52.51.51.4
    Tb<0.5<0.51.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5<0.5
    Yb0.63.34.46.11.12.41.35.75.23.5
    Lu0.070.310.530.670.170.280.160.670.610.37

    KSEEG
    Aug 30, 2024 Vol.57 No.4, pp. 353~471

    Stats or Metrics

    Share this article on

    • kakao talk
    • line

    Related articles in KSEEG

    Economic and Environmental Geology

    pISSN 1225-7281
    eISSN 2288-7962
    qr-code Download