Research Paper

Split Viewer

Econ. Environ. Geol. 2021; 54(4): 427-439

Published online August 31, 2021

https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2021.54.4.427

© THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY

Analysis of Domestic Aggregate Production of Korea in 2019 (II) - by Local Governments

Sei Sun Hong, Jin Young Lee*

Geologic Research Center, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, 124 Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34132, Korea

Received: July 24, 2021; Revised: August 20, 2021; Accepted: August 20, 2021

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided original work is properly cited.

Abstract

On the base of the aggregate extraction statistics, this study tried to analyse the demand and supply of aggregate resources of each local government and provide directions for the stable and sustainable supply and demand of aggregate resources in the future. In 2019, aggregates were produced in 148 cities, about 65% of the 229 cities of Korea, but in 7 metropolitan cities with 74 local governments, only 19 cities developed the aggregate. It means that aggregate extraction is taking place in almost all regions in Korea. Sand and gravel were produced in 110 districts and 132 districts, respectively. By aggregate source, river aggregates were extracted in 4 local governments, land aggregates in 42 local governments, forest aggregates in 75 local governments, crushed aggregates in 105 local governments, and washing aggregates in 15 local governments. In other words, 81 district in Korea have not extracted land-based aggregate at all. 71 local governments produced only one type of aggregate, and 55 local governments developed two types of aggregate, and 22 local governments developed more than three types of aggregate. In 2019, the leading producing local governments were, in descending order of volume, Ulju-gun, followed by Hwaseong-si, Cheongju-si, Pocheon-si, Paju-si, Yongin-si, Gimhae-si, Gwangju-si in Gyeonggi-do. 41 local governments have developed aggregates of more than 1 million m3, and the combined production of the 41 cities accounted for about 70% of national total. This shows that the aggregate extraction trend of local governments is becoming larger and more concentrated.

Keywords forest aggregate, screening crushed aggregate, land aggregate, sand, gravel

2019년도 국내 골재 수급 분석 (II) - 시군구단위 분석 -

홍세선 · 이진영*

한국지질자원연구원 지질연구센터

요 약

이번 연구에서는 골재채취통계를 기초로 하여 골재의 채취현황을 분석하고, 향후 골재의 안정적이고 지속적인 수급을 예측하고자 하였다. 2019년에는 전국 229개 시군구 중 약 65%인 148개 시군구에서 한 종류 이상의 골재를 개발하였다. 7대 광역시에서는 19개 시군구에서 골재를 개발되었다. 광역시를 제외하면 8개도의 155개 시군 중 83%인 129개 시군에서 골재개발이 이루어져 우리나라의 대부분 시군에서 골재를 개발하고 있다고 볼 수 있다. 모래는 110개 시군구에서, 자갈은 132개 시군구에서 개발되었다. 골재원별로 볼 때 하천골재는 4개 시군구, 육상골재는 42개 시군구, 산림골재는 75개 시군구, 선별파쇄골재는 105개 시군구, 선별세척골재는 15개 시군구에서 개발되었다. 또한 육지원 골재의 채취가 전혀 이루어지지 않은 시군구는 81개 지역이다. 골재원별로 볼 때 한 종류의 골재만 개발하는 시군구는 71개, 두 종류의 골재를 개발하는 시군구는 55개, 3종류 이상은 22개 시군구이다. 2019년에 골재의 개발이 가장 많은 지역은 울주군이며, 그 다음으로 화성시, 청주시, 포천시, 파주시, 용인시, 김해시, 광주시의 순이다. 100만㎥ 이상의 골재를 개발한 지역은 41개 시군구로 시군구은 골재채취 시군구의 약 28%이지만 골재개발량은 2019년도 총 개발량의 약 70%를 점유한다. 이는 각 시군의 골재채취가 대형화, 집중화되고 있음을 보여준다.

주요어 2019년 골재채취실적, 산림골재, 선별파쇄골재, 육상골재, 하천골재

Article

Research Paper

Econ. Environ. Geol. 2021; 54(4): 427-439

Published online August 31, 2021 https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2021.54.4.427

Copyright © THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY.

Analysis of Domestic Aggregate Production of Korea in 2019 (II) - by Local Governments

Sei Sun Hong, Jin Young Lee*

Geologic Research Center, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, 124 Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34132, Korea

Received: July 24, 2021; Revised: August 20, 2021; Accepted: August 20, 2021

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided original work is properly cited.

Abstract

On the base of the aggregate extraction statistics, this study tried to analyse the demand and supply of aggregate resources of each local government and provide directions for the stable and sustainable supply and demand of aggregate resources in the future. In 2019, aggregates were produced in 148 cities, about 65% of the 229 cities of Korea, but in 7 metropolitan cities with 74 local governments, only 19 cities developed the aggregate. It means that aggregate extraction is taking place in almost all regions in Korea. Sand and gravel were produced in 110 districts and 132 districts, respectively. By aggregate source, river aggregates were extracted in 4 local governments, land aggregates in 42 local governments, forest aggregates in 75 local governments, crushed aggregates in 105 local governments, and washing aggregates in 15 local governments. In other words, 81 district in Korea have not extracted land-based aggregate at all. 71 local governments produced only one type of aggregate, and 55 local governments developed two types of aggregate, and 22 local governments developed more than three types of aggregate. In 2019, the leading producing local governments were, in descending order of volume, Ulju-gun, followed by Hwaseong-si, Cheongju-si, Pocheon-si, Paju-si, Yongin-si, Gimhae-si, Gwangju-si in Gyeonggi-do. 41 local governments have developed aggregates of more than 1 million m3, and the combined production of the 41 cities accounted for about 70% of national total. This shows that the aggregate extraction trend of local governments is becoming larger and more concentrated.

Keywords forest aggregate, screening crushed aggregate, land aggregate, sand, gravel

2019년도 국내 골재 수급 분석 (II) - 시군구단위 분석 -

홍세선 · 이진영*

한국지질자원연구원 지질연구센터

Received: July 24, 2021; Revised: August 20, 2021; Accepted: August 20, 2021

요 약

이번 연구에서는 골재채취통계를 기초로 하여 골재의 채취현황을 분석하고, 향후 골재의 안정적이고 지속적인 수급을 예측하고자 하였다. 2019년에는 전국 229개 시군구 중 약 65%인 148개 시군구에서 한 종류 이상의 골재를 개발하였다. 7대 광역시에서는 19개 시군구에서 골재를 개발되었다. 광역시를 제외하면 8개도의 155개 시군 중 83%인 129개 시군에서 골재개발이 이루어져 우리나라의 대부분 시군에서 골재를 개발하고 있다고 볼 수 있다. 모래는 110개 시군구에서, 자갈은 132개 시군구에서 개발되었다. 골재원별로 볼 때 하천골재는 4개 시군구, 육상골재는 42개 시군구, 산림골재는 75개 시군구, 선별파쇄골재는 105개 시군구, 선별세척골재는 15개 시군구에서 개발되었다. 또한 육지원 골재의 채취가 전혀 이루어지지 않은 시군구는 81개 지역이다. 골재원별로 볼 때 한 종류의 골재만 개발하는 시군구는 71개, 두 종류의 골재를 개발하는 시군구는 55개, 3종류 이상은 22개 시군구이다. 2019년에 골재의 개발이 가장 많은 지역은 울주군이며, 그 다음으로 화성시, 청주시, 포천시, 파주시, 용인시, 김해시, 광주시의 순이다. 100만㎥ 이상의 골재를 개발한 지역은 41개 시군구로 시군구은 골재채취 시군구의 약 28%이지만 골재개발량은 2019년도 총 개발량의 약 70%를 점유한다. 이는 각 시군의 골재채취가 대형화, 집중화되고 있음을 보여준다.

주요어 2019년 골재채취실적, 산림골재, 선별파쇄골재, 육상골재, 하천골재

    Fig 1.

    Figure 1.The distribution map of domestic aggregate by local government. (unit : thousand m3) (A) river aggregate, (B) land aggregate, (C) forest aggregate, (D) crushed aggregate, (E) washing aggregate, (F) sand, (G) gravel, (H) total aggregate.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2021; 54: 427-439https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2021.54.4.427

    Fig 2.

    Figure 2.The quantities of aggregates by local governments.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2021; 54: 427-439https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2021.54.4.427

    Fig 3.

    Figure 3.The quantities by aggregate sources by local governments.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2021; 54: 427-439https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2021.54.4.427

    Fig 4.

    Figure 4.The comparison of number of local governments and aggregate volume produced by regional government.
    Economic and Environmental Geology 2021; 54: 427-439https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2021.54.4.427

    Table 1 . Rank of local governments produced aggregate in Korea, 2019.

    RiverLandForestMarineCrushedWashingSandGravelProduction of Aggregate
    1UiryongGochangUljuOngjinHwaseongChangwonCheongjuUljuUlju
    2GumiGoseong (Gangwon)GimhaeEEZ NamhaePocheonSeosanYonginHwaseongHwaseong
    3UiseongChungjuWonjuYonginSaha-gu (Busan)PocheonPajuCheongju
    4PyeongchangUiseongYeonchoengGwangjuJung-gu (Incheon)YeojuGwangjuPocheon
    5GimcheonPajuCheongjuNam-gu (Ulsan)YangjuWonjuPaju
    6AndongNajuNamyangjuJejuGimhaeSeo-gu (Incheon)Yongin
    7HampyeongCheongjuPajuGimpoOngjinPocheonGimhae
    8NamwonChungjuSeo-gu (Incheon)TongyeongHoengseongCheongjuGwangju (Gyeonggi)
    9YecheonAnseongYangjuSeo-gu (Incheon)NamyangjuGimhaeAnseong
    10GangreungChuncheonYeojuGoheungEEZ NamhaeAsanNamyangju
    11SangjuJincheonGoyangSacheonPajuChungjuYeoncheon
    12CheongjuHongseongAsanBoseongAnseongNajuWonju
    13UljinHoengseongSejongPyeongtaekHwaseongAnseongSeo-gu (Incheon)
    14YeongjuGunsanUijeongbuGwangyangYeoncheonYeoncheonYangju
    15GyeongjuHaenamAngseongGeojeSejongNamyangjuAsan
    16DonghaeNamwonYesanGwangjuJincheonYeoju
    17WonjuHamanUljuGoyangSejongChungju
    18SejongPocheonYangsanUijeongbuYangsanSeojong
    19GongjuHwasunGimpoUiryongHongseongGoyang
    20HwasunJeongupIksanJincheonGoyangJincheon

    Table 2 . The number of aggregate sources in Korea in 2019, by local government.

    No. of local governmentsTotal ExtractionPermissionDeclarationSandGravelRiverLandMountainMarineCrushedWashingOthers
    Seoul(25)000000000000
    Incheon(10)615550001420
    Daejeon(5)101100000100
    Gwangju(5)000000000000
    Daegu(8)404140000400
    Busan(16)505250000510
    Ulsan(5)313220010210
    Sejong(1)111110110100
    Gyeonggi-do(31)20520182000502020
    Gangwon-do(18)151012111517601201
    Chungcheongnam-do(15)13101011110670910
    Chungcheongbuk-do(11)1069790450900
    Jeollabuk-do(14)986790280601
    Jeollanam-do(22)201610121406130731
    Gyeongsangbuk-do(23)21201118172131401100
    Gyeongsangnam-do(18)1813131218111301241
    Jeju-do(2)222120220210
    합계14893112109132442751105154

    Table 3 . The aggregate product in Korea in 2019, by aggregate sources.

    Size range(thousand m3)number of local governments by aggregate sources
    Total ExtractionPermissionDeclarationSandGravelRiverLandMountainMarineCrushedWashingOthers
    >500311010010100
    400~500200010000000
    300~400314010010400
    200~3001036450030500
    100~20024171071700142*1000
    50~1003419171832121601611
    10~5050354142531143403862
    5~10631413814201331
    1~51211141811116301442
    <1545830610410
    total14490107102129436742101146

    Table 4 . The statistics of aggregate source and local governments.

    GyeonggiGangwonChungbukChungnamJeonbukJeonnamGyeongbukGyeongnamJejuIncheonDaeguBusanUlsanDaejeonSejongsum
    one type
    R101
    L101237
    Mt011262416
    M0011
    C1344311142441143
    W0011
    D.(Mt)1012
    two type
    L+Mt102133111
    R+L11
    Mt+C52123244124
    L+C212128
    Mt+W1113
    C+W212117
    Mt+D.(M)11
    three type
    L+Mt+C331141114
    Mt+C+D.(M)112
    R+Mt+C112
    Mt+C+W22
    C+W+D.(M)11
    four type
    L+Mt+C+W11

    R : River, L : Land, Mt : Mountain, M : Marine, C : Crushed, W : Washing, D.(Mt.) : Declaration(Mountain), D.(M) : Declaration(Marine).


    KSEEG
    Oct 29, 2024 Vol.57 No.5, pp. 473~664

    Stats or Metrics

    Share this article on

    • kakao talk
    • line

    Related articles in KSEEG

    Economic and Environmental Geology

    pISSN 1225-7281
    eISSN 2288-7962
    qr-code Download