search for




 

Evaluation of Economic Damage Caused by Drought in Central Region Vietnam: A Case Study of Phu Yen Province
Econ. Environ. Geol. 2021 Dec;54(6):649-57
Published online December 28, 2021;  https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2021.54.6.649
Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Economic and Environmental Geology.

Dinh Duc Truong*

Faculty of Environmental, Climate Change and Urban Studies, National Economics University, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam
Received July 14, 2021; Revised October 14, 2021; Accepted October 14, 2021.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 Abstract
This paper aims to study the impact of natural disasters on per capita income in Vietnam both the short and long-term, specifically impact loss of income caused by the extreme drought 2013 for agriculture, forestry and fishery in Phu Yen Province, Central Vietnam. The study valued economic damage by applying the synthetic control method (SCM), which is a statistical method to evaluate the effect of an intervention (e.g. natural disasters) in different case studies. It estimates what would have happened to the treatment group if it had not received the treatment by constructing a weighted combination of control units (e.g. control provinces). The results showed that the 2013 drought caused a decrease in income per capita, mainly in the agriculture, forestry, and fishery sector in Phu Yen. The reduced income was estimated to be VND 160,000 (1 USD = 23,500 VND (2021)) for one person per month, accounting for 11% of total income per capita and continued to affect the income 6 years later. Therefore, authorities need to invest in preventive solutions such as early and accurate warnings to help people to be more proactive in disaster prevention.
Keywords : Synthetic control method, drought, economic damage, Phu Yen province
Research Highlights
  • Research on economic damage caused by drought in Central Vietnam

  • Short-term and long-term effects of drought on manufacturing industries and domestic trade

  • Contributing to proposing solutions for drought management in the context of climate change in Vietnam

1. Introduction

Climate change is projected to create new hazards such as glacier melting, sea level rise and extreme weather events in proportions never seen before (Bosello et al., 2012). This will aggravate the existing disaster risks and vulnerabilities and expose millions of people never affected before around the world. Large and sudden disasters often have serious consequences compared to cyclical ones. The number of natural disasters, especially hydrometeorological disasters has been on the rise in recent years (Estrada et al., 2015). The loss and damages caused by natural disasters are expected to rise further in future largely due to climate change and the increased disaster exposure and vulnerability of our modern societies (Dietz 2011; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC 2012, 2014). Disasters caused by hydrometeorological events such as tropical cyclones, floods, landslides, and droughts have affected most countries in the South East Asia region (Pauw et al., 2012; Samphantharak 2019). Understanding the economic impact of natural disasters on local economy is critically important since it provides inputs for decision makers in the design and implementation of disaster risk management solutions. Economic policymakers need to estimate and forecast the economic impacts of disasters, differentiating disaster-driven economic fluctuations from other sources (Tran and Wilson 2020).

To mitigate the damage caused by natural disasters, scientists have developed many methods and models to predict natural disasters before they occur and help people to be more proactive in coping with natural disasters (Okuyama et al., 2004; Cavallo and Noy 2011; Loayza et al., 2012; Ackerman and Munitz 2012; Fomby et al., 2013; Fan et al., 2018; Botzen et al., 2019; Fatouros and Sun 2020). However, studies on the impact of natural disasters on economic variables have not been conducted much, especially those for an individual country (Loayza et al., 2012; Ahlerup 2013; Guo et al., 2015). In Vietnam, studies on the impact of natural disasters on the economy are mainly short-term (Ilan and Vu 2009; Le 2013; Im and Vu 2013) and long-term studies have not been conducted much.

This study applies the Synthetic Control Method (SCM) to estimate the economic damage caused by the extreme drought in 2013 in Phu Yen Province, Central Vietnam. SCM is a statistical method used to evaluate the effect of an intervention in comparative case studies by constructing a weighted combination of control groups, to which the treatment group is compared. This comparison is used to estimate what would have happened to the treatment group if it had not received the treatment. The drought in Phu Yen 2013 is chosen for the case study because it caused great damage in the Central region in the past 10 years. Additionally, it is appropriate time to apply SCM since it requires a pre-drought data series and a postdrought data series. The results of the damage valuation can inform decision makers in the design and implementation of solutions to prevent and increase community resilience to disasters.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of study area

Phu Yen Province is located in the lower Ba River basin. It is the largest river in the central coastal region, flowing through four central provinces of Viet Nam including Kon Tum, Gia Lai, Dak Lak and Phu Yen with an area 13,900 km2 (Fig. 1a). In 2013, it was the heaviest drought event in the period 2005-2016 in Phu Yen Province. Many areas in Phu Yen Province did not have rainfall in the first 6 months of the year. According to the Provincial Irrigation Sub-Department, in nearly 25,000 hectares of summerautumn rice, over 1,300 hectares in total had been lost. There were also 5,000 hectares of rice waiting to die (http://thongkephuyen.gov.vn/). All irrigation reservoirs in this province were below the dead water level. Two reservoir systems of Ba Ha and Song Hinh were used to supply water for the downstream area but water level in the rivers and streams in Phu Yen were dry, leading to a serious shortage of domestic water. According to Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (DARD) Phu Yen’s statistics, over 35,000 people in more than 10,200 households suffered from severe water shortage for their daily life. Dong Xuan, Son Hoa, Tuy Hoa, and Song Cau districts were severely affected. This province’s historic drought has also led to an unprecedented wildfire disaster. Only in the first three months of the year, there were 66 forest fires in the area, burning 1,200 hectares (http://sonongnghieppy.gov.vn/Home/List/29). In addition, there were over 2,400 hectares of burned plantation forest.

Figure 1. Ba River basin, Phu Yen Province.

2.2. Synthetic control method and data collection

2.2.1. Economic model of synthetic control method

According to the Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) (2020) (https://www.cred.be/), a natural disaster is defined as a natural event that is out of local control and requires external assistance. Also, according to CRED, a natural disaster is recorded when one of the following 4 conditions is established: (1) More than 10 deaths are reported; (2) More than 100 people are affected; (3) A state of emergency is declared; and (4) Call for external assistance is settled.

This study adopted the SCM model which have been applied in previous studies for disaster damage valuation (Abadie 2021; Albalate and Padró 2018; Cavallo et al., 2013; Sills and Herrera 2015). For SCM model, provinces are divided into two groups: the control group and the treatment group. The control group includes provinces that are not affected by drought and the treatment group is affected provinces by a drought (represented by Phu Yen Province). The specific model and estimation are described as follow:

Suppose that J is the number of provinces in control group. Thus, there are J+1 provinces in the dataset (including 1 province in treatment group). Call YitN is per capita income of province i at the time t if not being affected by the drought and Yit is per capita income of province i at the time t in case being affected by the drought 2013. For provinces i=1,J+1¯ and t=1,T¯ with T0 is time the drought occured (1< T0 < T). So, we have YitN = Yit for years before the drought occurred.

For years after the occurrence of the drought, let αit=Yit-YitN representing impacts of the drought on province i at time t, (t = T0 + 1, T0 + 2, …T). The objective of the study is to compare the per capita income of the province affected by the drought with other unaffected provinces. Therefore, we have to estimate:

αit=YitYitNwitht>10

Data about Yit is available, thus estimation of αit requires YitN. However, there are no data of YitN. SCM will estimate this parameter through the control group, or YitN is estimated as average weights of Yjt (per capita income of the control group) where j=2,J+1¯ or YitN could be estimated as follow:

Y1tN= j=2 J+1wjYjt

with wj≤0 (wj is the weight for the control provinces).

The estimation of wj as follow (Abadie 2010):

X1X0Wv= X 1 X 0 W'V X 1 X 0 W

subject to the restriction that w2,…, wJ+1 are nonnegative and sum to one.

withX1= X 11 X 12 X 1KX0= X 21 X 31 X J+1,1 X 22 X 32 X J+1,2 X 2K X 3K X J+1,K

where W is the matrix (J × 1) that contains the weights of the provinces in the control group, X1 is the matrix (K × 1) contains explanatory variables for per capita income of Phu Yen. X0 is the matrix (K × J) contains explanatory variables for per capita income of provinces in the control group. In the treatment province, there are similar explanatory variables.

Hence, (X1-X0W) is the difference between the treatment and control groups for explanatory variables. The SCM estimates the weights by minimizing the difference between Phu Yen province and the control group at the period of time before the drought occurs. The estimation of wj will help to identify provinces in the control group that are similar to Phu Yen in terms of income and other social and economic factors (Table 1).

Table 1 . List of 29 provinces in control group

North regionCentral regionSouth region
Bac CanDac LacBac LieuTay Ninh
Bac NinhGia LaiBinh DuongTien Giang
Dien BienBinh ThuanBinh PhuocTra Vinh
Hai DuongCa MauHo Chi Minh City
Ha NamDong NaiVinh Long
Hoa BinhDong Thap
Hung YenHau Giang
Thai NguyenKien Giang
Tuyen QuangLong An
Phu ThoSoc Trang


Once the weighting of the SCM has been determined for the pre - drought period, it is used to construct a counterfactual trend for the economic variables in the post-drought period. The difference between this counterfactual trend and the actual trend for the treated unit (Phu Yen) represents the estimated drought effect.

2.2.2. Statistical significance testing

In this case study, if the drought has an impact on reducing per capita income, it is able to estimate that the value of α^1t=Y1tJ Y^1tN is negative because per capita income in Phu Yen is less than the per capita income of control group. However, to test if this estimate is really negative or due to bias in data collection and processing, it is necessary to test α^1t. Based on research by Abadie et al. (2010, 2015), Abadie and L’Hour (2020), Cavallo et al. (2013), α^1t will be tested by permutation test. This test is also called the Placebo test. In the permutation test, estimating the change in income of unaffected provinces is by using SCM as for affected provinces. The p_value will be calculated as follows:

p_valuet=Prα^j,tPL(j)α^1,twithj=1,J+1¯

where p_value is the probability that the impact of the extreme drought in Phu Yen is less than that on the provinces in control group. In which α^j,tPL(j) is the estimated value of the income change of the control group.

2.2.3. Methods for identifying control groups

In the comparison, it is necessary to determine a control group to compare with a treatment group. The results are only meaningful when the control group is not affected by natural disasters and the treatment group is affected. However, among 63 provinces and cities (total in Vietnam), none of the provinces was not affected by the drought 2013. Furthermore, the impact of natural disasters on provinces varies in the extent of damage (number of deaths, destroyed houses). Therefore, the control group is defined again as a group that is not affected by the “major disaster”. So, to what extent of damage that a natural disaster is called “major disaster”.

According to Le (2013), “major disasters” are defined as 25% of the biggest recorded natural disasters or those with more than 5 deaths per million people and over 275 houses destroyed per million people. Therefore, the control group is the provinces that were neither affected by this drought nor any “major disaster” during the study period. Twenty-nine (29) provinces met the conditions of being the control group (Table 1, Fig. 1b).

Figure 2. Provinces, Cities, Capital in Vietnam.

2.3. Data collection

The research collected natural disaster and economic data during 2000-2019. Natural disaster data is applied to build the control group while economic data is to estimate the impact of disasters on per capita income. Disaster data was collected from the database “Disaster Information Management System” (www.desinventar.net) of the United Nations Office of Disaster Risk Reduction. This database provides information regarding disasters for all nations and regions including Vietnam. To test whether the control group is economically affected by major natural disasters after 2013, the dataset from CRED (2020) recording the losses caused by natural disasters from 1953 to the present is used. This dataset contains information in a provincial level.

Data on per capita income was collected from the General Statistics Office (GSO) for the period of 2009-2019 and variables are denoted in Table 2. The explanatory variables for per capita income were chosen based on recent empirical research on income (Vu and Im 2011). They are Sales Retail per capita (SALES) as a proxy for domestic trade, goods transported (INFR) representing infrastructure, capital for provinces (CAP), number of doctors per capita (DOCTOR) representing health care, the number of pupils per capita (STUDENT) representing education, and land per capita (LAND).

Table 2 . Mean of the variables in the period 2009-2019

VariablesExplainationUnitBefore drought (2009-2013)After drought (2019-2019)
Phu YenControl groupPhu YenControl group
Dependent variables
INCOMEPer capita incomeVND thousand/ month2331.252523.253396.603756.05
S_INCOMEIncome from salaryVND thousand/ month192.43206.74284.97373.83
AFF_INCOMEIncome from agricultural, forestry and fisheryVND thousand/ month242.73240.11317.74309.92
NAFF_INCOMEIncome from industry, construction, trade and serviceVND thousand/ month130.18153.09221.42234.98
Explanatory variables
SALESSale retail per capitaVND million/ person/ year5.196.809.7912.04
INFRGoods transportedTon×km/ person/ year0.260.430.390.69
DOCTORNumber of doctor per capitaNumber of doctors/ 1000 people2.482.462.572.68
CAPCapita for provincesVND million/ person/ year3.8717.675.5532.10
STUDENTNumber of pupils per capitaNumber of students/ 1000 people96.26114.1682.5996.05
LANDLand per capitaKm2/ 1000 people2.676.512.716.15
RICEAnnual rice yieldTon/ person/ year0.410.940.411.06
NUTTREEAnnual grain yieldTon/ person/year0.421.010.411.16
WOODAnnual timber productionM3/ person/ year0.010.070.000.08
FISHAnnual aquaculture productionTon/ 1000 people/ year153.3783.43316.01132.16

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Impact of the extreme drought on the per capital income of Phu Yen

From the available dataset, SCM was applied to assess the impact of drought on per capita income. The independent variables were selected including SALES, INFR, CAP, DOCTOR, STUDENT, and LAND. To minimize the gap between the treatment and control groups, the weights of provinces are estimated in details in Table 3. It is able to estimate the per capita income of Phu Yen province if there was no occurrence of drought 2013 by comparing the estimated income value and the actual income value of Phu Yen.

Table 3 . Weights of provinces in the control group

ProvinceWeightProvinceWeight
An Giang0Hau Giang0
Bac Can0Hoa Binh0
Bac Lieu0Hung Yen0
Bac Ninh0Kien Giang0
Binh Duong0.286Long An0
Binh Phuoc0Phu Tho0
Binh Thuan0Soc Trang0
Ca Mau0Tay Ninh0
Dac Lac0Thai Nguyen0
Dien Bien0.506Tien Giang0
Dong Nai0Ho Chi Minh0
Dong Thap0Tra Vinh0
Gia Lai0Tuyen Quang0
Hai Duong0Vinh Long0.242
Ha Nam0


Fig. 2 shows the actual income trend of Phu Yen (dashed line) and the control group (solid line). The detailed analysis shows that the drought reduced the per capita income of Phu Yen in the period 2013-2019 by VND 160,000. These results had statistical significance of less than 10% for the period 2013-2015 while other years had no statistical significance. In other words, in the short term, the 2013 drought caused a decrease in per capita income in Phu Yen, but in the long term, the drought had no impact on per capita income.

Figure 3. Phu Yen’s per capita income trend compared to the control group.

3.1.1. Permutation test for research results

The reliability of the research results is very important. Based on research by Abadie et al. (2010), the researcher used permutation tests to test the reliability of results. In this case, the decrease of Phu Yen’s per capita income was tested whether it was affected by drought. Fig. 3 shows all income gaps of permutation testing and Fig. 4 shows the p-value for periods.

Figure 4. Change of income in Phu Yen compared to the control group.
Figure 5. The significance of permutation test on income of Phu Yen.

3.2. Impact of the extreme drought on different per capita income

The GSO report on per capita income for provinces and cities was divided into smaller categories: income from salary, income from agriculture, forestry and fishery, income from industry, construction, trade, services, and income from other sources. In order to get more specific policy recommendations, the impact of drought on these income components was analyzed in more detailed.

3.2.1. Impact of the drought on income from agriculture, forestry and fishery

When analyzing the impact of drought 2013 on income from agriculture, forestry, and fishery (AFF-income) and in order to increase the reliability of the research results, the study included the following explanatory variables: Annual rice yield (RICE), annual grain yield (NUTTREE), annual timber production (WOOD) and annual aquaculture production (FISH) (Table 2). The analysis showed that the drought reduced the per capita income from agriculture, forestry, and fishery by an average of VND 220,000 per month, accounting for 11% of the average income of local people in Phu Yen. Fig. 5a shows the trends of income from agriculture, forestry and fishery of Phu Yen and the control group.

Figure 6. Trend of income from agriculture, forestry and fishery of Phu Yen and control group.
Figure 7. Agriculture, forestry, and fishery income changes of Phu Yen and control group.

Permutation test shows that the above results are statistically significant at 10% in 2013 and 2014, 5% in 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 (Fig. 4). From the above results, it is confirmed that in the long term, the drought impacts reduced incomes from agriculture, forestry, and fishery of people in Phu Yen.

3.2.2. Impact of the drought on income from salary

For income from salary, the selection of explanatory variables (SALES, INFR, CAP, DOCTOR and STUDENT) was similar to the income analysis. After analysis using synthetic control methods, the results show that this drought reduced income from salary. However, the results were not statistically significant after permutation tests. Fig. 5c shows the trend of Phu Yen’s income from salary compared to the control group.

Figure 8. Trends of income from salary of Phu Yen and control group.

3.2.3. Impact of the drought on income from industry, construction, trade and services

When analyzing the impact of this drought on income from industry, construction, trade, and services, the same control variables of the income from salary was selected (SALES, INFR, CAP, DOCTOR and STUDENT). After applying SCM, the trend analysis shows that drought increased the income from industry, construction, trade, and services (Fig. 5d). However, the results were also not statistically significant after permutation tests. This can be explained by the fact that reconstruction has been done after the disaster. Therefore, people’s income from these activities would be increased but only existed a few years after the drought occurred.

Figure 9. Trends of income from industry, construction, trade and services of Phu Yen and control group.
4. Conclusions and Recommendations

In this study, the SCM is applied for comparison of the control and the treatment groups to understand the effect of an extreme drought on per capita income in Vietnam. The treatment group was Phu Yen Province and 29 provinces selected from 63 provinces in Vietnam was included in the control group. The results showed that the drought reduced short-term per capita income. The decrease in per capita income caused by drought was estimated at VND 160,000 per month. This impact only existed within 3 years after the disaster occurred. When analyzing the components of income in more details, this extreme drought had no impact on income from wages nor income from industry, construction, trade, and services. However, it reduced the income from agriculture, forestry, and fishery in the long term. Per capita income from agriculture, forestry, and fishery due to the drought 2013 was reduced at VND 220,000 per month, equivalent to 11% of the per capita income of Phu Yen and lasted up to 6 years after tit occurred.

Therefore, the drought has a major impact on people whose income are mainly from agriculture, forests, and aquaculture. Therefore, policy makers and relief organizations should prioritize the affected people from agriculture, forestry, and fishery to avoid inefficient and unfair relief operations. Relief activities should not stop at the year when a disaster occurs but should be extended up to several years after that. Communities do not prepare to prevent for a drought as they do not think the event will last longer than expected. Therefore, to reduce the damage caused by drought and other natural disasters, localities need to raise peoplés awareness by propagating the impacts of natural disasters and the measures to mitigate those impacts. Authorities need to provide early and accurate warnings to help people to be more proactive in disaster prevention.

Funding

The authors receive support from the National Economics University, Vietnam.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article.

Conflicts of Interest
The author declare no conflict of interest.
References
  1. Ackerman, F. and Munitz, C. (2012) Climate damages in the FUND model: a disaggregated analysis. Ecological Economics, v.77, p.219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.005.
    CrossRef
  2. Ahlerup, P. (2013) Are natural disasters good for economic growth? Working papers in Economics No 553. University of Gothenburg.
  3. Abadie, A., Diamond, A. and Hainmueller, J. (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, v.105, p.493-505. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746.
    CrossRef
  4. Abadie, A., Diamond, A. and Hainmueller, J. (2015) Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science, v.59, p.495-510. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12116.
    CrossRef
  5. Abadie, A. and L’Hour, J. (2020) A penalized Synthetic Control Estimator for disaggregated data. October 24, 2020. Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/jeremylhour/research.
  6. Abadie, A. (2021) Using synthetic controls: feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 59, p.391-425. doi: 10.1257/jel.20191450.
    CrossRef
  7. Albalate, D. and Padró, G. (2018) The economic cost of a hurricane: a case study of Puerto Rico and hurricane Georges 1998 using synthetic control method. Working paper 2018/27, Research institute of applied economics, University of Barcelona.
  8. Bosello, F., Nicholls, R.J., Richards, J., Roson, R. and Tol, R.S.J. (2012) Economic impacts of climate change in Europe: sea-level rise. Climatic Change, v.112, p.63-81. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0340-1.
    CrossRef
  9. Botzen, W.J.W., Deschenes, O. and Sanders, M. (2019) The Economic Impacts of Natural Disasters: A Review of Models and Empirical Studies. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, v.13, p.167-188. doi: 10.1093/reep/rez004.
    CrossRef
  10. Cavallo, E. and Noy, I. (2011) Natural Disasters and the Economy - A Survey. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, v.5, p.63-102. doi: 10.1561/101.00000039.
    CrossRef
  11. Cavallo, E., Galiani, S., Noy, I. and Pantano, J. (2013) Catastrophic natural disasters and economic growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v.95, p.1549-1561. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00413.
    CrossRef
  12. Dietz, S. (2011) High impact, low probability? An empirical analysis of risk in the economics of climate change. Climatic Change, v.108, p.519-541. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9993-4.
    CrossRef
  13. Doan, Q.T., Tran, T.D. and Dinh, D.T. (2019) Application of Meteorological and Hydrological Drought Indices to Establish Drought Classification Maps of the Ba River Basin in Vietnam. Hydrology, v.6, p.49. doi: 10.3390/hydrology6020049.
    CrossRef
  14. Estrada, F., Botzen, W.J.W. and Tol, R. (2015) Economic losses from US hurricanes consistent with an influence from climate change. Nature Geoscience, v.8, p.880-884. doi: 10.1038/NGEO2560.
    CrossRef
  15. Fomby, T., Ikeda, Y. and Loayza, N.V. (2013) The growth aftermath of natural disasters. Journal of Applied Econometrics, v.28, p.412-434. doi: 10.1002/jae.1273.
    CrossRef
  16. Fan, Q., Fisher-Vanden, K. and Klaiber, H.A. (2018) Climate change, migration, and regional economic impacts in the US. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, v.5, p.643-671. doi: 10.1086/697168.
    CrossRef
  17. Fatouros, N. and Sun, Y. (2020) Natural Disasters and Economic Growth: A Semiparametric Smooth Coefficient Model Approach. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, v.13, p.320. doi:10.3390/jrfm13120320.
    CrossRef
  18. Guo, J., Liu, H., Wu, X., Gu, J., Song, S. and Tang, Y. (2015) Natural disasters, economic growth and sustainable development in China - An empirical study using provincial panel data. Sustainability, v.7, p.16783-16800. doi: 10.3390/su71215847.
    CrossRef
  19. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F., Dahe, Q. (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139177245.
    CrossRef
  20. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Climate change 2014-impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: part A: global and sectoral aspects: working group II contribution to the IPCC 5th assessment report: volume 1: global and sectoral aspects, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415379.
    CrossRef
  21. Im, E.I. and Vu, T.B. (2013) The impact of some policies on exports from Vietnam to the main partner in APEC: Gravity model. Journal of Economics and Development, v.274, p.1-10 (In Vietnamese).
  22. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    CrossRef
  23. Ilan, N. and Vu, T. (2009) The Economics of Natural Disasters in Vietnam. University of Hawaii Working paper 09-03.
  24. Loayza, N.V., Olaberria, E., Rigolini, J. and Christiaensen, L. (2012) Natural disasters and growth: Going beyond the averages. World Development, v.40, p.1317-1336. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.002.
    CrossRef
  25. Le, D.T. (2013) Economic and Welfare Impacts of Disasters in East Asia and Policy Responses: The Case of Vietnam. ERIA Discussion Paper Series, p.1-47. Online avaliable: https://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2013-11.pdf.
  26. Okuyama, Y., Hewings, G. and Sonis, M. (2004) Measuring the economic impacts of disasters: Interregional input?output analysis using the sequential interindustry model. In Y. Okuyama & S. Chang (Eds.), Modeling Spatial and Economic Impacts of Disasters. Heidelberg: Springer.
    CrossRef
  27. Pauw, K., Thurlow, J., Bachu, M. and van Seventer, D.E. (2012) The economic costs of extreme weather events: a hydrometeorological CGE analysis for Malawi. Environment and Development Economics, v.16, p.177-198. doi: 10.1017/S1355770X10000471
    CrossRef
  28. Samphantharak, K. (2019) Natural Disaster and Economic Development in Southeast Asia. Forthcoming, Economic Development of Southeast Asia (2019) MIT Press. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3388396.
    CrossRef
  29. Sills, E.O. and Herrera, D. (2015) Estimating the impacts of local policy innovation: the synthetic control method applied to tropical deforestation. PLoS One, v.10(7), p.e0132590. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132590.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Tran, B.R. and Wilson, D.J. (2020) The Local Economic Impact of Natural Disasters. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2020-34. doi: 10.24148/wp2020-34.
    CrossRef
  31. Vu, T.B. and Im, E.I. (2011) Vocational Schools and Regional Development in China. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, v.3, p.363-369. doi: 10.22610/jebs.v3i6.292.
    CrossRef

 

April 2022, 55 (2)